These are not failures in the traditional sense. They’re misjudgements that go uncorrected. Not because the leader lacks capability, but because they push harder when they should have listened better.
The interim leaders I see succeed don’t show up to prove how much they know. They arrive to observe, calibrate and earn trust from the outset. When they do make a misstep, as all leaders do, they recover. They stay self-aware and flexible. They adjust course without losing sight of their purpose. That is the real marker of success.
They treat resistance as feedback, not rejection. They invite challenge. They learn without defensiveness. They stay curious, especially when the pressure is on.
Great interim leaders do not arrive with all the answers. They arrive with the right questions. They create cultures where challenge is expected, not feared. Because without psychological safety, presence is just performance, not leadership.
That is what makes them so valuable when they get it right. They help organisations see what they could not see before, and they do it without losing sight of what matters most.